Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:40

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Let’s just make it real clear:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Defiant Tusk to call confidence vote to reassert his authority in Poland after election setback - politico.eu

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Can humans drink battery water?

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Why do Muslims invade Western society?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Thank you.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Trump Plans Biofuel Quota Boost, Seeks to Crimp Imports - Bloomberg

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry - AP News

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What was your most embarrassing and humiliating bare bottom spanking?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

What’s next?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Can Make Anyone Look Bad - Defector

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Scientists stunned after detecting unexpected shift in Antarctic Ice Sheet: 'A historic turnaround' - Yahoo